MBendi - Information for Africa
Directory Searches
Site Map
 The World  > Electrical Power

World: Electrical Power - Nuclear Generation
 - Industry Overview


^ Background

The population of the world continues to grow, as does the average standard of living, increasing demand for food, water and energy and placing increasing pressure on the environment. The population of the world doubled from 3.2 billion in 1962 to 6.4 billion in 2005 and is forecast to grow to 9.2 billion in 2050.

Supplies of oil, gas, coal and uranium are forecast to peak as reserves are depleted. At the same time, fear of climate change is putting pressure on the energy sector to move away from carbon burning to nuclear, solar and other environmentally friendly energy sources.

^ Uranium Preparation

Mined uranium ore is dissolved in sulphuric acid to produce uranium oxide which is then converted into uranium hexafluoride containing about 0.7% U-235. This is then fed through gas centrifuges thereby increasing U-235 levels to 3.5% to 5% and from this uranium dioxide powder is formed for insertion into the tubes making up fuel rods.

The rods are placed in a reactor where nuclear fission generates heat which is used in the turbines to generate electricity.

^ Types of Plant / Technology

To date, the preferred technologies have been pressurised water reactors (PWR) and boiling water reactors (BWR). All nuclear reactors currently in regular operation are thermal reactors, most of them light-water reactors which can only fission 0.6%-0.7% of natural uranium:

  • 264 Pressurised Water Reactors (PWR) located in the USA, France, Japan and Russia and with a combined capacity of 250.5 Gwe. The fuel used is enriched UO2 and the coolant is water and the moderator is water.
  • 94 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR) located in the USA, Japan and Sweden and with a combined capacity of 86.4 Gwe. The fuel used is enriched UO2 and the coolant is water and the moderator is water.
  • 43 Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors 'CANDU' (PHWR) located in Canada and with a combined capacity of 23.6 Gwe. The fuel used is natural UO2 and the coolant is heavy water and the moderator is heavy water.
  • 18 Gas-cooled Reactors (AGR & Magnox) located in the UK and with a combined capacity of 10.8 Gwe. The fuel used is enriched UO2 and natural U (metal), and the coolant is CO2 and the moderator is graphite.
  • 12 Light Water Graphite Reactors (RBMK) located in Russia and with a combined capacity of 12.3 Gwe. The fuel used is enriched UO2 and the coolant is water and the moderator is graphite.
  • 4 Fast Neutron Reactors (FBR) located in Japan, France and Russia and with a combined capacity of 1 Gwe. The fuel used is PuO2 and UO2 and the coolant is liquid sodium and the moderator is none.
  • 4 other types of reactor located in Russia and with a combined capacity of 0.05 Gwe. The fuel used is enriched UO2 and the coolant is water and the moderator is graphite.

New designs are being considered including EPR (Evolutionary Power Reactor). Finland is constructing an EPR, France plans to build an EPR demonstrator at Flamanville and the USA is preparing to build using several designs including AP1000, ESBWR and EPR.

New reactor designs are being developed and tested capable of extracting more than 30 times the energy from the uranium than today´s reactors. New technologies plan to make use of thorium as well as spent fuel from current nuclear reactors and the depleted Uranium stocks used for enrichment. New Generation IV reactors currently being designed include Pebble Bed Modular Reactor, VHTR (Gas Cooled), SFR (Sodium), Fast LFR (Lead), Fast GFR (Gas), Fast MSR (Molten Salt) and SCWR (Steam Cooled).

Theoretically, a breeder reactor is able to fission about 60% of natural uranium atoms via conversion into plutonium. The MIT study The Future of Nuclear Power does not expect breeder reactors will come into operation during the next three decades.

The first fusion reactor producing net electricity may be built around 2050. In November 2006, the Euro 10 billion Iter nuclear fusion reactor project was given the green light.

Most nuclear power plants originally had a nominal design lifetime of up to 40 years, but engineering assessments of many plants over the last decade has established that many can operate longer.

^ Design and Construction

The nuclear power design and construction industry is dominated by four groups: Rosatom of Russia; Areva and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries; General Electric (GE) and Hitachi; and Westinghouse which is controlled by Toshiba. In October 2006, Areva and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries announced a joint venture to produce 3G nuclear power stations.

In Kazakhstan, a joint venture with Russia's Atomstroyexport envisages development and marketing of innovative small and medium-sized reactors, starting with a 300 MWe Russian design as baseline for Kazakh units.

^ Existing Plants

Nuclear power currently provides between 2.5% and 6% of all non biomass fuel, depending on the source quoted. Nuclear power comprises 15.7% of world electricity generating capacity including 30% in Western Europe, 19% in North America and 17.5% in Eastern Europe, including Russia.

In the 1980s, 218 power reactors started up, including 47 in the USA, 42 in France and 18 in Japan. The average power was 923.5 MWe.

As of March 2008, there were 439 nuclear power reactors operating in 31 countries with 371,989 MWe total capacity and more than 11,000 reactor-years of operating experience. There were 104 in the USA, 55 in Japan, 31 in Russia, 20 in South Korea, 17 in India, 11 in China and 200 elsewhere in the world. In 2006 they produced 2,658 billion kWh or 16% of world electricity generation and consumed 64,615 tonnes uranium. Currently these reactors require about 67,000 tonnes of natural uranium per year.

^ Plans

Rising gas prices, greenhouse constraints on coal and concerns, particularly in Europe, about energy security have led to a change of sentiment about nuclear power which is increasingly seen as a more environmentally friendly energy source than carbon.

It can take five years to plan, design and licence a nuclear power plant and a further five years to build.

Resource Capital Research findings showed that planned and proposed new nuclear power reactors worldwide increased significantly from May to August 2007. The main increases were from China with 114 planned and proposed new nuclear power reactors announced, up from 63 in January 2007 (an increase of 81%); and the USA is up from 23 to 32 units. Russia has 25 planned and proposed nuclear power reactors, the Ukraine 22, and India 19. This represents a global demand for 304 new nuclear reactors, an increase of 37% in 7 months and an increase of 99% from the number of planned and proposed new nuclear power reactors reported in May 2006.

Nuclear power capacity worldwide is increasing steadily but not dramatically, with, as of early 2008, 35 reactors with a capacity of 28,798 MWe under construction. Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, France, India, Iran, Japan, Pakistan, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine and the USA have all announced plans to build, between them, more than 100 new reactors with a combined capacity of 100,000 MWe. A further 228 with a capacity of 198,995 MWe are under consideration. Most reactors on order or planned are in the Asian region, a trend driven by growing electricity demand, though plans are firming for new units in Europe, the USA and Russia.

Significant further capacity is being created by plant upgrading. In addition, plant life extension programs are maintaining capacity, in the USA particularly. In some countries, existing plants are being uprated by as much as 30%.

The IEA anticipates at least 60 new plants producing 430 GWe installed by 2020. This is 130 GWe more than projected in 2000 and 16% more than produced in 2006. This would give nuclear power a 17% share in electricity production in 2020. By 2025, world nuclear energy capacity is expected to grow to between 450 GWe and 530 GWe from the present generating capacity of about 370 GWe. This will raise annual uranium requirements to between 80,000 tonnes and 100,000 tonnes.

^ Operation

If the Nuclear Power Industry lives up to it's promises for modern, 3rd generation plants, the total levelised cost of Nuclear Power including contruction, operational, waste disposal and decommissioning costs is in the range 3 - 5 cents per KiloWatt-Hour depending on the interest rate obtained for the construction. Nuclear Power plants pay back the energy required to build them in less than 2 months of operation.

Current world proven reserves of Uranium are sufficient to supply current world demand for 50 years. Speculative reserves provide an additional 150 years of supply. The cost of Uranium Ore is a very small fraction of the operating costs of Nuclear Power. Fourth Generation Nuclear Plants can fully utilize all the energy in Natural Uranium. There is sufficient Uranium and Thorium on Earth for Fourth Generation reactors to supply the total World demand for energy for hundreds of centuries.

^ Emissions

Some sources calculate that generating electricity from nuclear power emits 20-40% of the carbon dioxide per KW hour of a gas-fired system. Nuclear Power Plants emit significantly less greenhouse gases than fossil fuel stations. Some CO2 emissions arise from the construction of the plant, the mining of the Uranium, the enrichment of the Uranium, its conversion into Nuclear Fuel, its final disposal and the final plant decommissioning.

^ Costs

The cost of nuclear power generation comprises three main components: the design, development and construction cost; the operating cost, including waste disposal; and the decommissioning cost.

The cost of uranium is a very small factor in the cost of running a nuclear power station. Because of the cost structure of nuclear power generation, with high capital and low fuel costs, the demand for uranium fuel is much more predictable than with probably any other mineral commodity. Once reactors are built, it is very cost-effective to keep them running at high capacity and for utilities to make any adjustments to load trends by cutting back on fossil fuel use. Demand forecasts for uranium thus depend largely on installed and operable capacity, regardless of economic fluctuations. Nuclear power plants are designed to be in service for more than 40 years with an up-time of 90% or better.

The 2008 design cost is estimated to be in the region of US$ 1,500 per KW capacity, with operating costs of around 2 US cents per KW hour. Models estimate the total electricity cost as 3 to 4 US cents per KW hour. Westinghouse estimates that the cost of a nuclear power plant in the USA is US$ 18.60 per MWh, of which 25% is fuel related, compared to US$ 22.58 per MWh, of which 77% is fuel related, for a coal-fired plant. In France, the use of a standard design and sharing of knowledge between plants resulted in lower costs than in the USA or UK where several standard designs were employed and information sharing between operators was limited.

In many countries a charge is levied, based on the output of the plant, in order to defray the cost of waste disposal and eventual decomissioning. There is minimal agreement between countries on the cost of decommissioning.

Fast breeder reactors have a higher risk profile due to the need to handle large quantities of Plutonium and electricity produced by such a plant would cost several times that from conventional nuclear power plants.

^ Feedstock

Uranium-235, comprising 0.72% of natural uranium is the only fuel currently used in nuclear power plants. Thorium-232 is a possible nuclear fuel, while fast breeder reactors are planned that can use uranium-235 or plutonium-239, which is created from the much more common uranium-238.

Uranium 2005: Resources, Production and Demand, jointly prepared by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the IAEA, estimates that world reserves of uranium ore that can be mined for less than US$ 130 per kg are some 4.7 million tonnes. Based on the 2004 nuclear power demand for uranium, this is sufficient for 85 years. Fast reactor technology would lengthen this period to over 2,500 years.

As of early 2008, the 440 nuclear reactors operating worldwide required 78,500 tonnes of uranium oxide concentrate containing 66,500 tonnes of uranium annually. Mines met 58% of demand in 2006 and 64% of demand in 2007, with the balance coming from secondary sources such as dismantled warheads; government and civilian stockpiles of uranium and plutonium; recycled uranium and plutonium from spent fuel, as mixed oxide fuel; and re-enriched depleted uranium tails.

Weapons-grade is about 97% U-235, and this can be diluted with depleted uranium to reduce it to about 4%, suitable for use in a reactor. From 1999 the dilution of 30 tonnes such material is displacing about 10,600 tonnes per year of mine production. The USA and Russia have agreed to dispose of 34 tones each of military plutonium by 2014. Most of it is likely to be used as feed for MOX plants. Military and civilian stockpiles are now largely depleted.

It is estimated that each GWe of additional capacity will require about 600 tonnes of uranium at start-up and 195 tonnes uranium per year thereafter. Over the 20 years from 1970 there was a 25% reduction in uranium demand per kWh output in Europe due to operational improvements. By 2025, annual uranium requirements will be between 80,000 tonnes and 100,000 tonnes.

In the uranium market, very high prices in the late 1970s, when many nuclear power plants were built, gave way to historical lows of less than US$ 22 / kg in the early 1990s, as the public became disillusioned with nuclear power. In 1996 prices recovered to the point where most mines could produce profitably, though they then declined again and only started to recover strongly late in 2003. The price of Uranium then rose to a peak of over US$ 300/kg in 2007 then declined to US$ 165 by early 2008.

The rise in prices has led to a flurry of exploration and a 50% increase in reserves. Only 20% of uranium is traded on the spot market. Most sales take place via term contracts between mining companies and power producers, giving greater certainty to both, though the price generally reflects a premium above spot price.

Note that at the prices which utilities are likely to be paying for current delivery, only one quarter of the cost of the fuel loaded into a nuclear reactor is the actual ex-mine (or other) supply. The balance is mostly the cost of enrichment and fuel fabrication.

^ Reprocessing

Major commercial reprocessing plants are operating in France and UK, with capacity of over 4000 tonnes of spent fuel per year. The product from these re-enters the fuel cycle and is fabricated into fresh mixed oxide (MOX) fuel elements. About 200 tonnes of MOX is used each year, equivalent to less than 2000 tonnes of U3O8 from mines.

^ Related Pages

Related pages: World | Energy | Oil | Gas | Coal | Electricity | Renewables | Biofuels | Solar | Wind | Uranium | Nuclear

>
>
>
>
> Other News

Information Source: MBendi - Modified: 07.May.2008
[ Home ] [ About MBendi ] [ Policy ] [ Legal Disclaimer ]
Users of the MBendi website are assumed to have read and agreed to our terms and conditions
© 1995-2008, MBendi and its associated information providers